Technology Leadership, your competitive edge

Imagine IT as more than just a tool and cost center for your business. With strong leadership, IT becomes an innovator, improving processes and creating value across the organization. Discover the opportunities today.

Archive for April, 2006

Computer Donation Programs

Thursday, April 13th, 2006

Why does it seem to be so difficult to donate working used computer gear to charity?

One of my clients has sold their practice and is shutting down.  A bunch of their old but still usable equipment, and a stack of licensed software, is going to be available lying around without a home. 

Previously I've worked with a charitable foundation that claimed to be interested – but they only wanted some of my gear – no printers, cables, network equipment or anything like that.  This time around, they're not interested at all. 

I contacted PCs for Schools as well.  They're only interested in complete systems that are Pentium III's or higher.  When I asked about older computers, they said they throw them into the garbage.  I thought the point of this process was to get these computers OUT of the garbage. 

Yesterday I managed to find a group that seems to break the mould – the Electronics Recycling Association.  They've been responsive and seem genuinely interested in the stack of computer equipment I have – even the parts and slower computers. 

Some of my friends and I have had lunch-hour talks about how it should be very easy to harvest older computers and get them into the hands of those who need them.

What I find surprising (and somewhat disappointing) is that none of the computer stores have teamed up with an organization like the ERA to help get all the old computers into the hands of people who need them (instead of in the closet or garbage bin). 

If someone is buying a new computer, chances are they have an old one just sitting around without a home.  If they're l a dead one, I bet there's lots of parts worth scavenging. 

In my google search, I found discussion threads from other techies having the same issue as me – they have a pile of gear that really shouldn't go into the garbage, but nobody seems to want it.  It's definitely worth while to tap on the shoulder of some community leaders, be it bloggers or community websites (like TechVibes) and get the word out there. 

Getting help rebuilding the PCs and getting things ready to go shouldn't be a problem either.  By working with local high schools and technical schools, a charitable organization should be able to get enough free (or near free) work experience students.  That way there's a double-benefit – learning and getting machines ready to be reused. 

Since I'm already preparing a package for the ERA, I will happily gather equipment from my contacts and other clients for donation.  If you have something you'd like to add to the pile, please send me an e-mail or contact the ERA directly.

US Patent Insanity

Thursday, April 6th, 2006

I completely agree with RIM's CEO's recent blasting of the US Patent system.  As I read through my daily dose of geek-news I often find myself shaking my head at some of the ridiculous things that manage to get patented and the lawsuits that constantly clog up the US legal system. 

There's no possible way that someone deserves a patent for "how to draw a box on a computer screen".  And yes, I'm sure there's a patent for that. 

While I know the patent system CAN help protect inventors, it's main use has become making often-questionable companies very rich through overly-generic patents and huge lawsuits. 

RIM and many other companies are calling for a reform of patent laws.  I'm very much behind them on this one.  Both the patent office and the way the US judicial system handles patent infringment cases has to change.  There's no way there should ever be the kind of ransom that RIM paid to NTP.  $671 million is just ridiculous. 

This is going to be an even bigger issue in the next couple years.   As "nanotech" matures, the USPO is going to go through the same issues as it did with software – they don't know enough about nanotech to ensure that patents are reasonable. 

When you end up having a company or group patenting a basic building block for an entire technology it can do significant harm to an emerging (or even mature) market.  How can a new technology grow and flourish when researchers and companies are mired in patent-landmines around every corner?

More BlackBerry Support Excitement

Monday, April 3rd, 2006

Believe it or not, I finally got my BlackBerry Server issues resolved. It only took 3 weeks. When I called them (for the final time) last week, I had yet another ridiculous experience. It went a little something like this …
(more…)